AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Lower TDP (275W vs 320W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock2505MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 +466%

48.74 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 4080 +446%

28272

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

GeForce RTX 4080 +340%

132

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

GeForce RTX 4080 +278%

246

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 4080 +275%

300

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 4080

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Sep 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2205 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2505 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1400 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

716.8GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

76

4096

Shading Units

9728

256

TMUs

304

64

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

304

-

RT Cores

76

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

64 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

280.6 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

761.5 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

48.74 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

48.74 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

320W

600 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

AD103

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

AD103-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro W9100

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 PCI

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6770 Green Edition

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 550

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro S9170

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market