Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +656%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
38W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT215
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy