Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2040MHz vs 900MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X
2.304 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +35%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Neptune
GPU Name
Navi 24
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy