Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2004
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
NV41
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy