Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
1.962 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +29%
2.534 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2020
Crystal System
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
61.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
1.962 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
122.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG1
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy