Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 720A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 720A 's Advantages
Boost Clock938MHz
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +1560%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce 720A
0.18 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
775 MHz
-
Boost Clock
938 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.752 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
180.1 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.01 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GF117
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N14M-GE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy