Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +4%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 24
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy