Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7170M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +25%
3.723 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Amethyst
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy