Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1548%
8.192 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV670
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy