Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +40860%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 SE
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G98S
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy