AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

2816 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock1725MHz

Lower TDP (100W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano +85%

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4.416 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1%

4667

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano +47%

28

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

19

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +50%

60

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

40

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano +17%

75

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

64

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Nov 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1530 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

20

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

1280

256

TMUs

80

64

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU116

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

100W

450 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

5

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

7

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Related News

1

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

2

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

3

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

4

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

5

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

6

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

7

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

8

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

9

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

10

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience