Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +20905%
8.192 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy