Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +644%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy