Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 +1059%
7.119 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
7.119 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
445.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 30
GPU Name
Cayman
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy