Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 150% (2321MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (53W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400 +274%
3.565 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2013
Navi II
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

53W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy