Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 176W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6650 XT +395%
10.79 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2055 MHz
Base Clock
-
2635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2190 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.3GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

168.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
337.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
21.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
674.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

176W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy