Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6750 XT +1963%
13.31 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2150 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

166.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
416.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
26.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
832.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 22
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
335 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy