Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +58976%
23.04 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
Navi II
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
18W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy