Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 335W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

335W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy