Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7800 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon RX 7800 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2800MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3360 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7800 +4759%
37.32 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2011
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
480
240
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

358.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
672.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
86.02 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
43.01 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1344 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 32 XT
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy