Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +475%
45.98 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1287 MHz
Base Clock
-
2245 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
320
TMUs
256
160
ROPs
64
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

359.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
718.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
91.96 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.98 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1437 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy