Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2394MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Navi III
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1387 MHz
Base Clock
-
2394 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
-
336
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

459.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
804.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
103.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
51.48 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1.609 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 31 XT (215-145000156)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy