Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5664 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 355W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +10459%
81.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2011
Navi III
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
3300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
480
384
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

633.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
1267 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
162.2 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

355W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 31 XTX+
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy