Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 9070 XT +4026%
22.12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
Navi IV(RX 9000)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2210 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2438 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
624.1GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
-
-
-
64
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

259.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
691.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
44.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.12 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 48
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 48 XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy