Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1546MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +271%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2012
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy