Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S9000

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +292%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2012
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy