Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 165% (2520MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +2628%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Sky
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
1792
Shading Units
18432
112
TMUs
576
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
800W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD102
Orthrus
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy