Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (29W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
134.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
11.22 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GF119
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
R500
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy