Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
RV610
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy