Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro W4100

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy