Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV610
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy