Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GA107
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy