Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy