Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI FirePro V8800

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Cypress
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy