Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro W5000

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy