Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy