NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2314%
12 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV670
-
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
