Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +50%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
2816
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy