Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 810

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (2130MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1034%
12 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy