Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs MTT S50

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs MTT S50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +130%
12 TFLOPS
MTT S50
5.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
48
ROPs
88
Tensor Cores
22
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
12 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.2 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
ChunXiao
-
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

70W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4
None
Power Connectors

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.7
Shader Model

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy