NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+5669%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT
0.208 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2247%
8147
GeForce 9600 GT
347
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
8
2816
Shading Units
64
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
