Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2560%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
3
2816
Shading Units
144
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy