NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Lower TDP (70W vs 220W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2475MHz vs 2130MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER +195%

35.48 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Jan 2024

Quadro Ada

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

1980 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

2475 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

128bit

Memory Bus

192bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

504.2GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

56

-

Compute Units

-

2816

Shading Units

7168

88

TMUs

224

48

ROPs

80

88

Tensor Cores

224

22

RT Cores

56

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

198.0 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

554.4 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

35.48 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

35.48 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

554.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

AD104

-

GPU Variant

AD104-350-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

70W

TDP

220W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

8.9

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip