CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 133.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1001%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 470
1.089 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GTX 470
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
837 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
133.9GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
448
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
40
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.02 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.05 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1089 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-275-A3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy