Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2130MHz vs 1243MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +109%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7300X
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1188 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy