NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2130MHz vs 1677MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Lower TDP (70W vs 345W)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +14%

13.74 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Aug 2017

Quadro Ada

Generation

Vega

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

1406 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1677 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

945 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM2

128bit

Memory Bus

2048bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

483.8GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

-

Compute Units

64

2816

Shading Units

4096

88

TMUs

256

48

ROPs

64

88

Tensor Cores

-

22

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

12 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

107.3 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

429.3 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

27.48 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

13.74 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

858.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Vega 10

-

GPU Variant

Vega 10 XTX

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 5.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

5 nm

Process Size

14 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

12.5 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

495 mm²

Board Design

70W

TDP

345W

250 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip