Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1050

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV410
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
24W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy