NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and a Professional market GPU: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1560MHz)

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages

More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +59%

19.17 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2649

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +36%

3612

OctaneBench

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

295

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +50%

443

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Mar 2023

Quadro Ada

Generation

Quadro Ada

Desktop

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

720 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

20GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

160bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

280.0GB/s

Render Config

-

22

SM Count

48

2816

Shading Units

6144

88

TMUs

192

48

ROPs

80

88

Tensor Cores

192

22

RT Cores

48

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

124.8 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

299.5 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

19.17 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

19.17 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W

TDP

70W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

AD104

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

8.9

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9170

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon 540

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes