Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 840A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 840A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +935%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce 840A
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 800A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM108
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy