Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 38W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +3139%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 360M
0.276 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
275.7 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N11E-GS1-A3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy